"Which skeletal imaging modality is best for assessing bone health in children and young adults compared to DXA? A systematic review and meta-analysis".
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Skeletal imaging techniques have become clinically valuable methods for measuring and assessing bone mineral density in children and young people. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the current reference standard for evaluating bone density, as recommended by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD). Various bone imaging modalities, such as quantitative ultrasound (QUS), peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) have been developed to further quantify bone health in children and adults. The purpose of this review, with meta-analysis, was to systematically research the literature to compare the various imaging methods and identify the best modality for assessing bone status in healthy papulations and children and young people with chronic disease (up to 18 years).
METHODS
A systematic computerized search of Medline, PubMed, and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify English-only studies published between 1st January 1990 and 1st December 2019. In this review, clinical studies comparing imaging modalities with DXA were chosen according to the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias and quality of articles was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). The meta-analysis to estimate the overall correlation was performed using a Fisher Z…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Erratum to: The National Osteoporosis Foundation’s position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations
- Association between obesity and risk of fracture, bone mineral density and bone quality in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Dietary Patterns in Relation to Low Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Association of obesity with bone mineral density and osteoporosis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Falls, fractures, and areal bone mineral density in older adults with sarcopenic obesity: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
- Exercise training and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies with emphasis on potential moderators
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.