Evidence Hub

Meta-analysis of genome-wide studies identifies WNT16 and ESR1 snps associated with bone mineral density in premenopausal women

D. Koller, Hou-Feng Zheng, D. Karasik, L. Yerges-Armstrong, Ching-Ti Liu, F. McGuigan, J. Kemp, S. Giroux et al.

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2013

5,597 participants · 99 citations

Abstract

Previous genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) have identified common variants in genes associated with variation in bone mineral density (BMD), although most have been carried out in combined samples of older women and men. Meta‐analyses of these results have identified numerous single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of modest effect at genome‐wide significance levels in genes involved in both bone formation and resorption, as well as other pathways. We performed a meta‐analysis restricted to premenopausal white women from four cohorts (n = 4061 women, aged 20 to 45 years) to identify genes influencing peak bone mass at the lumbar spine and femoral neck. After imputation, age‐ and weight‐adjusted bone‐mineral density (BMD) values were tested for association with each SNP. Association of an SNP in the WNT16 gene (rs3801387; p = 1.7 × 10−9) and multiple SNPs in the ESR1/C6orf97 region (rs4870044; p = 1.3 × 10−8) achieved genome‐wide significance levels for lumbar spine BMD. These SNPs, along with others demonstrating suggestive evidence of association, were then tested for association in seven replication cohorts that included premenopausal women of European, Hispanic‐American, and African‐American descent (combined n = 5597 for femoral neck; n = 4744 for lumbar spine). When the data from the discovery and replication cohorts were analyzed jointly, the evidence was more significant (WNT16 joint p = 1.3 × 10−11; ESR1/C6orf97 joint p = 1.4 × 10−10). Multiple independent…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,597 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free