Evidence Hub

Effects of exercise on bone mass and bone metabolism in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wen-Hua Zhang, Xiaoqiang Wang, Yu-Rong Liu, Qiang He, Qi-Xin Ding, Jing Mei, Xun Li

Frontiers in Physiology, 2024

723 participants · 22 citations

Abstract

Objective Meta-analysis was used to evaluate the effects of an exercise intervention on bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), and bone metabolism in adolescents. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for RCTs on “exercise, adolescents, BMD, bone metabolism” up to 10 September 2024. Included RCTs focused on effects of exercise on BMC, BMD, and bone metabolism in 10–19 years old, with physical activity as exercise group and daily living/primal exercise as control group. Outcome metrics included lumbar spine, femoral neck, whole body BMC and BMD, bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP), procollagen type 1N-terminal propeptide (PINP), osteocalcin (OC), and type I collagen carboxy-terminal peptide (CTX). Exclusion criteria included duplicates, non-RCTs, non-adolescent studies, and non-compliance with indicators. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4, and quality assessed by Cochrane’s tool. Effect sizes were estimated using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic to determine fixed or random effects models. Results Fifteen articles with a total of 723 subjects were included. The meta-analysis showed that, compared to the control group, (i) exercise was effective in increasing adolescents’ overall BMC (SMD = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.06–0.27, p = 0.003) and BMD (SMD = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.13–0.40, p = 0.0001). (ii) Subgroup analyses showed that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 723 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free