Evidence Hub

Empagliflozin and left ventricular diastolic function following an acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes

Lan NSR, Yeap BB, Fegan PG, Green G, Rankin JM, Dwivedi G

The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021

44 participants

Abstract

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors can improve heart failure outcomes, however, the effects on left ventricular (LV) function remain unclear. This prospective observational study aimed to investigate whether initiating empagliflozin therapy was associated with improved LV diastolic function following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Patients with ACS and T2D were identified during hospitalisation in a cardiology unit. Empagliflozin was initiated at discharge in eligible patients (i.e. HbA1c > 7%) without contraindications or precautions. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed during admission and after 3-6 months. Changes in echocardiographic parameters were compared between patients initiated on empagliflozin versus not initiated on empagliflozin (control). There were 22 patients in each group (n = 44). Baseline characteristics, medications and echocardiographic parameters were similar except HbA1c (empagliflozin: 9.8 ± 1.6% versus control: 6.6 ± 0.7%, p < 0.001). Baseline LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) (empagliflozin: - 12.4 ± 2.8 versus control: - 13.0 ± 3.6%) and ejection fraction (51.1 ± 11.3 versus 54.9 ± 10.8%) were similar. The difference in change from baseline to follow-up was significant for LV mass index (empagliflozin: - 14.1 ± 21.6 versus control: 3.6 ± 18.7 g/m2, p = 0.006), left atrial volume index (- 2.1 ± 8.1 versus 3.4 ± 9.5 ml/m2, p = 0.045), mitral valve E-wave velocity (- 0.14 ± 0.23 versus 0.03…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 44 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free