Evidence Hub

The effects of anti-Parkinsonian medications on bone mineral density: A systematic review

M. Breasail, Motaz B. El-Leissy, Karan P Singh, Matthew Smith, Jakub Mesinovic, Marc Sim, Andrew Evans, D. Blacker et al.

Bone, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with elevated fracture risk, particularly at the hip. Antiparkinsonian medications have also been associated with increased fracture risk; although their direct effects on bone mineral density (BMD) remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Investigate whether antiparkinsonian medications influence BMD.

METHODS

A systematic search of four databases (Embase, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science) was conducted up to 24/11/2025 using terms related to PD, antiparkinsonian medications and bone.

RESULTS

A total of 748 records were identified, with 543 screened following deduplication. Fourteen studies underwent full-text review, of which seven met inclusion criteria. Three studies assessed bone mineral content or surrogate measures at non-standard sites (hand radiographs or skull Hounsfield Units) and reported no associations with L-Dopa therapy. Four studies reported areal BMD (aBMD) from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). One study showed negative correlations between L-Dopa dosage with aBMD at the hip and spine. Two studies (RCT and cross-sectional) implicated elevated serum homocysteine (Hcy) levels induced by L-Dopa as a potential mechanism for osteoporosis risk in PD. In the cross-sectional study, although L-Dopa therapy was associated with higher Hcy and lower aBMD, there were no causal associations between L-Dopa and hip aBMD. In the RCT, lower Hcy was associated with reduced annual aBMD loss with L-Dopa therapy. One further study…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free