Evidence Hub

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A systematic review

S. McCarrison, S. Abdelrahman, R. Quinlivan, R. Keen, Sze Choong. Wong

Bone, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long term glucocorticoid treatment in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is associated with a high incidence of fragility fractures. This systematic review aims to assess the current evidence for pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis in children and adults with DMD.

METHODS

Three online databases (Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library) were searched for studies that evaluated interventions for treatment or prevention of osteoporosis in DMD. Included studies had to report changes in bone mineral density (BMD) or bone mineral content (BMC) Z-scores or fracture incidence.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were identified, including twelve that evaluated bisphosphonate, three evaluated testosterone (2 studies of the same patient group), one evaluated vitamin D/calcium, one teriparatide, and two evaluated vibration therapy. Only two randomised-controlled trials were found, one of intravenous bisphosphonate and one of vibration therapy. Changes in lumbar spine BMD ranged from -0.3 to +1.3 in studies of bisphosphonate and - 0.2 to 0.0 with vibration therapy, whereas this was +0.38 with testosterone and + 0.9 with vitamin D/calcium. There was limited information on impact on fracture in all studies. None of the pharmacological studies involved a fracture naïve group at baseline. In addition, none addressed a group of individuals over 18 years at baseline.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides evidence for the effectiveness of bisphosphonate therapy in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free