Evidence Hub

Exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and bone health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Khosrojerdi MA, Lotfi H, Babaei Z, Mirhamidi M, Keyvanloo Shahrestanaki M

International journal of environmental health research, 2024

Abstract

Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as a large group of synthetic compounds widely contaminated the environment and lead to health problems. However, the correlation between PFAS exposure, bone health parameters and osteoporosis remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature to evaluate the effects of PFAS on human bone health. All observational studies were collected up to 2 December 2023. A total of 2096 articles were retrieved. Of these, 21 articles investigated the association between PFAS exposure and human bone health. However, only 10 studies were included in the final meta-analysis. Doubling of serum perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) (β = -0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.18, -0.05) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) (β = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11, -0.01) levels showed significant negative correlations with total body less head bone mineral density (TBLH-BMD). Subgrouping showed that only perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.68) was correlated with osteoporosis.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free