Evidence Hub

Racial Differences in Sonographic Evaluation in Suspected Cases of Endometrial Neoplasia

Rotenberg O, Fridman D, Goldstein S, Leone FPG, Miguel C, Wu H, Alcazar JL, Dar P et al.

JAMA network open, 2026

1,833 participants

Abstract

Importance: Black women have twice the endometrial cancer mortality of White women, and studies suggest that differences in ultrasound diagnostic accuracy partially contribute to this disparity.

Objective: To evaluate racial and ethnic differences in the diagnostic performance of transvaginal ultrasound for detecting endometrial neoplasia.

Design, setting, and participants: A prospective cohort study of 1833 women aged 50 years or older at risk of endometrial neoplasia, conducted at a large urban academic medical center from February 2014 to August 2022, with follow-up through March 2023. The statistical analyses were conducted from March 2024 to December 2025.

Interventions: Women underwent endometrial assessment via transvaginal ultrasound followed by sonohysterogram-directed biopsy and follow-up observation to establish final outcome.

Main outcome and measures: Assessment of transvaginal ultrasound diagnostic performance for detecting endometrial cancer and hyperplasia across racial and ethnic groups, measured by: (1) completion rate (endometrial accessibility) and (2) accuracy of completed scans. To assess any association with fibroids, analyses were repeated after excluding women with fibroids. Subgroup analyses were conducted among women with endometrial cancer, those with postmenopausal bleeding, and those without prior exposure to estrogen or tamoxifen.

Results: A total of 1833 women met inclusion criteria (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [8.1] years). Most were postmenopausal…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,833 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free