Evidence Hub

Effect of adjuvant endocrine therapy: single-agent vs. switching on breast cancer-free and overall survival - a retrospective cohort study

Rangel-Méndez JA, Flores-Flores EM, Rubi-Castellanos R, Sánchez-Cruz JF, Moo-Puc RE

Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2025

300 participants

Abstract

Background: Patients with hormone-dependent breast cancer (HDBC) are prescribed adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) in the form of tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors (AI), either as single-agent endocrine therapy (SAET) or with a switch between them. However, the decision to maintain either strategy remains controversial. We aimed to compare breast cancer-free survival (BCFS) and overall survival (OS) in Mexican patients with HDBC under AET, be it as SAET or switching mode.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 300 patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2014. The association of BCFS and OS with clinical variables was analyzed with Cox and binary logistic regression models.

Results: In the univariate Cox models, compared to AI-based SAET, only tamoxifen-based SAET [hazard ratio (HR): 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-3.3] exhibited association with BCFS; this became non-significant in the multivariate model. In the multivariate logistic models, compared to AI-based SAET, both tamoxifen-based SAET [odds ratio (OR): 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.2] and switching (OR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.3--.9) schemes were associated with recurrence or death events. Additionally, patients with an AET duration longer than 36 (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.06-0.54) and 60 (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.09-0.75) months had 82% and 74% lower odds of experiencing recurrence/death, respectively.

Conclusions: The data revealed discrepancies between the logistic and Cox regression models regarding the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 300 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free