Evidence Hub

Change in mammographic density as a potential predictor of cancer recurrence after breast conservation surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy: results of the MEDICI study

Savaridas SL, Marshall A, Ali K, Astley SM, Evans AJ, Halling-Brown M, Vinnicombe S, Warwick VR et al.

Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026

Abstract

Background: Oestrogen-receptor positive breast cancer patients are typically treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET), some develop AET resistance. Previous research suggests mammographic density (MD) may represent an imaging biomarker, with fewer local or distant recurrences occurring with decreasing MD. We investigate whether reduction in MD after 1 and/or 3 years is associated with improved breast cancer specific survival (BCSS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) or disease-free survival (DFS).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was generated from a Mammo-50 trial subset. Participants taking AET (cases) and controls were included. MD was assessed in the AET group using a 0-100% visual analogue scale (VAS). Readers scored mammograms at diagnosis, 1 year and 3 years post-surgery. A decrease in MD was defined as ≥10% reduction from diagnosis. A second reader reviewed paired mammograms and assessed whether there had been a temporal change in MD.

Results: Data from 1364 cases and 367 controls were included. Median VAS MD was approximately 30% for cases and controls at all time-points; 20% showed decreased MD at 1 year and 21% at 3 years for both cases and controls. Of the AET group, 23 died from breast cancer and 33 developed metastases during follow-up (median 8.7 years post-surgery). The 5-year BCSS rate was 99.6% (95%CI:97.4-99.9) versus 98.3% (95%CI:97.2-98.9) for those with and without a ≥10% reduction in MD at 1 year, p=0.35. The 5-year MFS rate for those with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free