Evidence Hub

Healthy dietary patterns, typical healthy foods and risk of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Chen J, Xu Y, Zhao K

Frontiers in oncology, 2026

533,828 participants

Abstract

Background: Previous observational studies have investigated the associations between adherence to healthy dietary patterns and endometrial cancer risk; however, pooled quantitative evidence synthesizing healthy dietary patterns and typical healthy foods remains limited. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to quantitatively synthesize available evidence on healthy dietary patterns, typical healthy foods and endometrial cancer risk.

Methods: Studies published up to February 2026 were systematically identified using PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Embase and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases. Random- effects or fixed-effects models were used to calculate pooled relative risks (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) where appropriate. Heterogeneity across studies was quantified using Cochran's Q test and the I2 statistics.

Results: Thirty-five articles with a total of 533,828 participants and 17,758 endometrial cancer cases were included in our analysis. Compared with the lowest intake of healthy dietary patterns, the highest intake was associated with a 22% lower risk of endometrial cancer (RR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.65- 0.93, P = 0.006).Additionally, the highest intakes of total vegetables (RR = 0.83;95%CI:0.75-0.92, P = 0.001) and whole grains (RR = 0.90; 95%CI:0.84-0.98, P = 0.012) were significantly associated with reduced risk of endometrial cancer. Comparatively, high intakes of fruits and fish showed no…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 533,828 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free