Evidence Hub

Impact of smoking on subtypes and molecular profile of breast cancer: a systematic review

Ntella G, Bothou A, Kyrkou G, Deltsidou A, Georgakopoulou VE, Tzeli M, Vlachou M, Diamanti A

Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2026

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer encompasses heterogeneous pathological and molecular subtypes with distinct aetiologies and clinical outcomes. Although cigarette smoking is an established carcinogenic exposure, its subtype-specific associations and molecular effects in breast cancer remain insufficiently clarified. This systematic review synthesizes epidemiological, molecular, and prognostic evidence on how active cigarette smoking influences the risk of specific breast cancer subtypes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review, including observational and translational human studies that assessed active cigarette smoking in relation to breast cancer subtypes defined by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, or by intrinsic molecular classifications. We also included studies evaluating smoking-associated molecular alterations within breast tumors.

Results: Nineteen studies met the eligibility criteria. Epidemiological evidence suggested a possible modest increase in the risk of luminal/ER-positive breast cancer, particularly among women with longer smoking duration, heavier cumulative exposure, or smoking initiation before first full-term pregnancy; however, the pooled meta-analysis for current vs. never smoking was not statistically significant. No meaningful association was identified for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and findings for HER2-positive breast cancer were heterogeneous. Molecular studies…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free