Evidence Hub

Risks of diabetic foot syndrome and amputation associated with sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

D. Li, Yu-Feng J. Yang, T. Wang, S. Shen, H. Tang

Diabetes & Metabolism, 2018

26,167 participants · 55 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently issued a safety communication requiring new warnings of increased leg and foot amputation risk be added to canagliflozin drug labelling. However, the risk associated with other sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) remains uncertain.

AIM

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the potential risks of diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) and amputation associated with SGLT2i.

METHODS

Relevant databases were searched from inception to June 14, 2017 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated risks of DFS and amputation associated with SGLT2i use. A random effects model was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using STATA 14.

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs involving 26,167 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. SGLT2i were not significantly associated with increased risk of DFS compared with placebo (OR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.58-1.89). No significant association was observed in the subgroup and sensitivity analysis on DFS risk either. Although SGLT2i, as a class, were not significantly associated with amputation risk (OR 1.40, 95% CI: 0.81-2.41), subgroup analysis showed an increased incidence of amputation in participants using canagliflozin (OR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.37-2.60), compared with oral anti-diabetic drugs and placebo, but not in those using empagliflozin (OR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.71-1.48).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence from RCTs suggests that canagliflozin may be positively…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 26,167 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free