Evidence Hub

Immunoglobulin A-dominant membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis-like pattern of injury as a possible paraneoplastic nephropathy in a breast cancer patient

Taira S, Kawagoe M, Anzai H, Yasukawa M, Asakawa S, Arai S, Yamazaki O, Tamura Y et al.

CEN case reports, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

A middle-aged woman was found to have proteinuria during a health check-up. About sixteen months later, she was diagnosed with stage IIA invasive ductal carcinoma of the right breast. Her proteinuria progressed to nephrotic syndrome with significant hematuria. Hormone therapy was initiated for her estrogen and progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer. A kidney biopsy performed 47 days after starting the therapy revealed an IgA-dominant membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis-like pattern of injury. Electron microscopy showed subendothelial-dominant electron-dense deposits (EDD), with small amounts of mesangial EDD and a single occurrence of subepithelial hump-like EDD, along with occasional mesangial interpositions. Similar pathology can be caused by IgA vasculitis with nephritis, IgA-dominant infection-associated glomerulonephritis, and liver disease-associated glomerulopathy, but all of these were ruled out. The deposited IgA was found to be galactose-deficient IgA1. Thus, IgA nephropathy with glomerular capillary IgA deposition was considered. She underwent a right partial mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy in the right axilla 75 days after starting hormone therapy, followed by adjuvant radiation. Proteinuria and hematuria tended to decrease after the treatment, and this trend continued even after corticosteroid therapy for glomerulonephritis, which was administered 156 days after starting hormone therapy. Approximately 15 months after starting hormone…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free