Evidence Hub

Design, Synthesis, and Computational Analysis of 4-Amino-1,2,4-Triazol-3-one Schiff Base Derivatives as Potent α-Glucosidase Inhibitors

Yeye EO, Babatunde DD, Okpala EO, Ashiru DL, Akorlor E, Magwa NP

2026

Abstract

Abstract Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains a major global health challenge, driving the search for novel α-glucosidase inhibitors with improved efficacy and safety profiles over existing therapies. Here, we report the design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a new series of Schiff bases derived from 4-amino-1,2,4-triazol-3(4H)-one (compounds 1–10) as potential antidiabetic agents. The compounds were synthesized and characterized by 1 H-NMR and EI-MS, and their α-glucosidase inhibitory activities were assessed in vitro using acarbose as the reference standard. The series exhibited a broad range of potencies, with IC₅₀ values ranging from 10.2 ± 0.19 to 39.4 ± 0.15 µg/mL. Notably, compounds 8 (10.2 ± 0.19 µg/mL) and 10 (11.0 ± 0.68 µg/mL) exhibited significantly stronger inhibition than acarbose (23.0 ± 0.13 µg/mL), while compounds 4 (17.5 ± 0.56 µg/mL) and 5 (18.0 ± 0.41 µg/mL) demonstrated comparable or slightly higher activity. To elucidate structure-activity relationships and potential multitarget antidiabetic profiles, density functional theory (DFT)-optimized geometries were subjected to molecular docking against three validated targets: α-glucosidase (AglA, PDB ID: 10BB), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4, PDB ID: 1NU6), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2, PDB ID: 8HDH). Several derivatives, particularly compounds 1 and 7, exhibited binding affinities comparable to or exceeding those of reference ligands acarbose, sitagliptin, and empagliflozin. These…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free