Evidence Hub

Empagliflozin versus Dapagliflozin for Kidney Outcomes in Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Multi-center Cohort Study

Bharati J, Bosch NA, Upadhyay A

2025

34,877 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2)-inhibitors are key in chronic kidney disease (CKD) management with empagliflozin and dapagliflozin being the two most commonly used. Comparative data between them in CKD is limited. Methods A propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted using data from a network of 103 North American organizations. Adults with Stage 3 CKD who initiated empagliflozin or dapagliflozin between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2023, were compared. The primary outcomes was the composite of Stage 5 CKD or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Follow-up continued until outcome or up to 3 years (censored on May 4, 2025). Results 60,689 and 34,877 patients with Stage 3 CKD were initiated on empagliflozin and dapagliflozin, respectively. Among matched patients with Stage 3 CKD (N = 33,583 per group) empagliflozin initiation was associated with lower risk of Stage 5 CKD or ESKD (5.2% vs 6.2%; HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.77–0.88) over ~ 670 days. All-cause mortality was similar between groups. Stage 5 CKD and ESKD rates were lower in the empagliflozin group. Stage 5 CKD or ESKD was lower for patients initiated on both empagliflozin 25 mg daily and 10 mg daily compared to dapagliflozin 10 mg daily. Conclusion In this multi-center retrospective cohort study, the risk for Stage 5 CKD or ESKD was lower for patients with Stage 3 CKD who initiated empagliflozin versus dapagliflozin over ~ 2.0 years. Prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 34,877 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free