Comparison of complications in cranioplasty with various materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Liu L, Lu ST, Liu AH, Hou WB, Cao WR, Zhou C, Yin YX, Yuan KS et al.

British journal of neurosurgery, 2020

2,913 participants

Abstract

Objective: Meta-analysis to evaluate complications in the use of autogenous bone and bone substitutes and to compare bone substitutes, specifically HA, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and titanium materials.Methods: Search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Google scholar to identify all citations from 2010 to 2019 reporting complications regarding materials used in cranioplasty.Results: 20 of 2266 articles met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 2913 patients. The odds of overall complication were significantly higher in the autogenous bone group (n = 214/644 procedures, 33.2%) than the bone substitute groups (n = 116/436 procedures, 26.7%, CI 1.29-2.35, p < 0.05). In bone substitutes groups, there was no significant difference in overall complication rate between HA and Ti (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.47-3.14, p = 0.69). PEEK has lower overall complication rates (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30-0.87, p = 0.01) and lower implant exposure rates (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.53, p = 0.002) than Ti, but there was no significant difference in infection rates and postoperative hematoma rates.Conclusions: Cranioplasty is associated with high overall complication rates with the use of autologous bone grafts compared with bone substitutes. PEEK has a relatively low overall complication rates in substitutes groups, but still high infection rates and postoperative hematoma rates. Thus, autologous bone grafts should only be used selectively, and prospective long-term studies are needed to further refine…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,913 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

• DOI
• PubMed
• Publisher page

Related studies

• Benign periarticular, bone and joint lipomatous lesions Singapore medical journal, 2017
• A review of the physiological and histological effects of laser osteotomy Journal of medical engineering & technology, 2017
• Quality of bone healing: perspectives and assessment techniques Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 2014
• Effects of bioactive lipids and lipoproteins on bone Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM, 2014
• Bone structure and function Instructional course lectures, 1987
• Quantifying bone structure, micro-architecture, and pathophysiology with MRI. Clinical radiology, 2018

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free