Evidence Hub

Does non-erosive rheumatoid arthritis exist? A cross-sectional analysis and a systematic literature review

Amaya-Amaya J, Calixto OJ, Saade-Lemus S, Calvo-Paramo E, Mantilla RD, Rojas-Villarraga A, Anaya JM

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2015

500 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and factors associated with non-erosive rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS: First, a cross-sectional analytical study was performed. Non-erosive disease, defined as the absence of any erosion on X-rays after 5 years of RA, was evaluated in 500 patients. Further and additional evaluations including ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) were performed in those patients meeting the eligibility criteria. The Spearman correlation coefficient, kappa analysis, and Kendall׳s W test were used to analyze the data. Second, a systematic literature review (SLR) was performed following the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS: Of a total of 40 patients meeting the eligibility criteria for non-erosive RA, eight patients were confirmed to have non-erosive RA by the three methods. A positive correlation between non-erosive RA and shorter disease duration, antinuclear antibodies positivity, lower rheumatoid factor (RF) and C-reactive protein titers, lower global visual analog scale values, toxic exposures, and lower disease activity-(RAPID3) was found. In addition, an inverse correlation with anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) positivity and medication use was observed. From the SLR, it was corroborated that factors associated with this subphenotype were shorter disease duration, younger disease onset, negative ACPA and RF titers, low cytokine levels, and some genetic markers.

CONCLUSION: Non-erosive RA is rare, occurring in less than 2%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 500 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free