Evidence Hub

Prognostic factors among 130 patients with osteosarcoma

Pochanugool L, Subhadharaphandou T, Dhanachai M, Hathirat P, Sangthawan D, Pirabul R, Onsanit S, Pornpipatpong N

Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1997

Abstract

One hundred thirty patients with high grade osteosarcoma were enrolled in a randomized prospective multidisciplinary treatment that included intraarterial chemotherapy, local irradiation, limb salvage surgery, and prophylactic whole lung irradiation. The patients were evaluated to stage the prognostic factors. In a multivariate analysis, a minimal level of serum lactic acid dehydrogenase less than 300 IU/L showed a significant prognostic value. The history of trauma before diagnosis of disease, local irradiation of the affected site, histologic response to preoperative multidisciplinary therapy, and prophylactic whole lung irradiation were associated with significantly better prognosis in the log rank test. Patient age, site of the primary tumor, presentation of fracture, pathologic subtype, signs and symptoms, serum alkaline phosphatase level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were not found to be prognostic factors. The 9-year survival rate of the whole group was 55%.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free