Evidence Hub

Treatment of multiple myeloma with etidronate: results of a multicentre double-blind study. Groupe d'Etudes et de Recherches sur le Myélome (GERM)

Daragon A, Humez C, Michot C, Le Loet X, Grosbois B, Pouyol F, Euller-Ziegler L, Azais I et al.

The European journal of medicine, 1993

49 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Because osteoclastic bone resorption is stimulated in multiple myeloma, we evaluated the efficacy of etidronate in this disease, in a multicentre controlled study.

METHODS: Ninety-four previously untreated patients with stage II or III multiple myeloma received, in addition to the same chemotherapy, 10 mg/kg/day etidronate per os (n = 49) or placebo (n = 45) for 4 months. The evaluation was clinical (pain, Karnofsky, survival), biological and radiological. Forty-one patients had iliac bone biopsy before the treatment and 34 patients also at the end of the study. Histologic bone parameters were compared with 49 normal controls.

RESULTS: No statistical difference was found between etidronate and placebo treated patients for clinical, biological and radiological parameters. Compared with controls, pretreatment biopsies showed markedly increased bone resorption and decreased trabecular bone volume. Bone resorption decreased significantly in patients with etidronate compared with those with placebo (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Though we found no clinical, biological and radiological difference with placebo, etidronate inhibited the increased bone resorption in multiple myeloma.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 49 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free