Evidence Hub

Comparison of bone levels after intramuscular administration of cephradine ('Velosef') or flucloxacillin/ampicillin in hip replacement

Brooks S, Dent AR

Pharmatherapeutica, 1984

48 participants

Abstract

Serum and bone levels of antibiotics were measured after the intramuscular injection of either 1 g cephradine or 500 mg flucloxacillin plus 500 mg ampicillin in 48 patients undergoing total hip replacement. The results showed that both regimens produced adequate blood levels, but that the levels after cephradine were higher and more prolonged. Bone levels of cephradine were significantly higher than for flucloxacillin or ampicillin. In half of the patients studied, flucloxacillin bone levels were below the limit of detection in both cancellous and cortical bone samples. In all 24 patients, cortical levels of cephradine were satisfactory for anti-staphylococcal activity although cancellous levels were unsatisfactory in 4 patients. The penetration of the antibiotics was greater into cortical bone than into cancellous bone.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 48 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free