Evidence Hub

Evaluation of bone mineral density after renal transplantation under a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression: a pilot study

Goffin E, Devogelaer JP, Depresseux G, Squifflet JP, Pirson Y, van Yperselede de Strihou C

Clinical nephrology, 2003

23 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Progressive bone loss consistently complicates renal transplantation (TP) in patients given an immunosuppression including prednisolone. The adjunction of cyclosporine in the immunosuppressive regimen does not reverse the negative impact of renal TP on the skeleton. The post-transplant effect of tacrolimus on bone mass is still unknown.

METHODS: We evaluated the evolution of bone mineral density (BMD) and various biochemical markers over the first 12 months following renal TP in 23 patients given an immunosuppression combining tacrolimus and low-dose prednisolone. BMD of lumbar spine, total hip and hip subregions was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry within the first 15 days and 1 year after TP.

RESULTS: At the time of TP, the average BMD was low in both the lumbar spine and the hip. After TP, a normalization of serum creatinine and a decrease in serum phosphate and iPTH levels occurs. Serum alkaline phosphatase level significantly rose transiently within the first 6 months and decreased thereafter. At 1 year post TP, BMD remained unchanged in the lumbar and in the trochanter subregions and rose in the other sites. BMD increased by at least 2% in 8, 13, 10 and 10 out of the 23 patients in the lumbar, neck, trochanter and total hip subregions, respectively. No correlation was found between evolution in BMD and age, sex, dialysis duration, level of hyperparathyroidism, prednisolone and tacrolimus cumulative intake and prescription of calcium, vitamin D…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 23 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free