Evidence Hub

The influence of disuse on bone microstructure and mechanics assessed by HR-pQCT.

Kazakia GJ, Tjong W, Nirody JA, Burghardt AJ, Carballido-Gamio J, Patsch JM, Link T, Feeley BT et al.

Bone, 2014

12 participants

Abstract

Numerous clinical cohorts are exposed to reduced skeletal loading and associated bone loss, including surgical patients, stroke and spinal cord injury victims, and women on bed rest during pregnancy. In this context, understanding disuse-related bone loss is critical to developing interventions to prevent fractures and the associated morbidity, mortality, and cost to the health care system. The aim of this pilot study was to use high-resolution peripheral QCT (HR-pQCT) to examine changes in trabecular and cortical microstructure and biomechanics during a period of non weight bearing (WB) and during recovery following return to normal WB. Surgical patients requiring a 6-week non WB period (n=12, 34.8±7.7 yrs) were scanned at the affected and contralateral tibia prior to surgery, after the 6-week non WB period, and 6 and 13 weeks after returning to full WB. At the affected ultradistal tibia, integral vBMD (including both trabecular and cortical compartments) decreased with respect to baseline (-1.2%), trabecular number increased (+5.6%), while trabecular thickness (-5.4%), separation (-4.6%), and heterogeneity (-7.2%) decreased (all p<0.05). Six weeks after return to full WB, trabecular structure measures reverted to baseline levels. In contrast, integral vBMD continued to decrease after 6 (-2.0%, p<0.05) and 13 weeks (-2.5%, p=0.07) of full WB. At the affected distal site, the disuse period resulted in increased porosity (+16.1%, p<0.005), which remained elevated after 6…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free