Comparative effects of clodronate and calcitonin on bone in metastatic breast cancer: a histomorphometric study
Abstract
We studied the effects of long-term treatment with clodronate, calcitonin or placebo on bone in 36 normocalcaemic women with osteolytic metastases due to breast cancer. Clodronate (1.6 g daily given to 12 patients) induced a significant decrease in osteoclast surface and osteoclast number, and a significant fall in serum calcium and urinary excretion of calcium and hydroxyproline, an effect not noted after treatment with calcitonin (100 U in 12 patients) or in 12 placebo-treated patients. Treatment with clodronate did not abnormally suppress bone turnover nor impair mineralisation, as measured by bone formation and mineral apposition rates.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 36 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Benign periarticular, bone and joint lipomatous lesions
- A review of the physiological and histological effects of laser osteotomy
- Quality of bone healing: perspectives and assessment techniques
- Effects of bioactive lipids and lipoproteins on bone
- Bone structure and function
- Quantifying bone structure, micro-architecture, and pathophysiology with MRI.
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.