Evidence Hub

Idiopathic myoclonus in the oromandibular region during sleep: a possible source of confusion in sleep bruxism diagnosis

Kato T, Montplaisir JY, Blanchet PJ, Lund JP, Lavigne GJ

Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 1999

41 participants

Abstract

As part of a larger study, polysomnographic and audiovisual data were recorded over 2 nights in 41 subjects with a clinical diagnosis of sleep bruxism (SB). Electromyographic (EMG) events related to SB were scored according to standard criteria (Lavigne et al. J Dent Res 1996;75:546-552). Post hoc analysis revealed that rapid shock-like contractions with the characteristics of myoclonus in the jaw muscles were observed in four subjects. EMG bursts characterized as myoclonus were significantly shorter in duration than bursts classified as SB. None of the subjects had any history of myoclonus while awake. Myoclonic episodes were more frequent in sleep stages 1 and 2 than in REM. Half of the episodes contained one or two contractions whereas the other half had three or more repetitive contractions. SB and myoclonus coexisted in one subject. To rule out sleep epilepsy, full electroencephalogram montage was done in three subjects and no epileptic spikes were noted. Our results suggest that approximately 10% of subjects clinically diagnosed as SB could present oromandibular myoclonus during sleep.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 41 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free