Evidence Hub

Establishing normative data on scapulothoracic musculature using handheld dynamometry

Turner N, Ferguson K, Mobley BW, Riemann B, Davies G

Journal of sport rehabilitation, 2009

172 participants

Abstract

CONTEXT: Scapular strength deficits have been linked to shoulder dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To establish normative data on the scapulothoracic musculature in normal subjects using a handheld dynamometer.

DESIGN: Descriptive normative data study.

SETTING: Field research.

SUBJECTS: 172 subjects with varying levels of overhead activity.

METHODS: A handheld dynamometer was used to test the upper, middle, and lower trapezius; rhomboids; and serratus anterior.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A 2-factor ANOVA was performed for each of the muscles by activity level and unilateral ratio by activity-level analyses. Post hoc analysis included multiple pairwise comparisons, using the Dunn-Bonferroni correction method.

RESULTS: Activity level did not significantly affect the unilateral ratios: Elevation:depression was 2.5:1, upward:downward rotation was 1.5:1, and protraction:retraction was 1.25:1. A rank order from strongest to weakest was established through significant comparisons.

CONCLUSION: The unilateral ratios along with the rank order should be considered when discussing scapular rehabilitation protocols.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 172 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free