Evidence Hub

Renal and systemic hemodynamic effects of empagliflozin: Three randomized, double blind, placebo controlled cross-over trials

Nielsen SF, Duus CL, Buus NH, Bech JN, Mose FH

2024

17 participants

Abstract

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) improve renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). A decrease in renal blood flow (RBF) with attenuation of glomerular hyperfiltration may contribute to this. We examined renal and systemic hemodynamic effects of SGLT2i in relevant patient categories.

Methods: Using a double-blind placebo controlled cross-over design we randomized patients with DM2 and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 ml/min/1.73m 2 (n=16), patients with DM2 and eGFR 20-60 ml/min/1.73m 2 (n=17) and patients with non-diabetic CKD and eGFR 20-60 ml/min/1.73m 2 (n=16) to empagliflozin 10 mg daily or placebo for four weeks and crossed over to the opposite treatment after two-week washout. RBF was measured with 82 Rubidium positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 82 Rb-PET/CT), GFR as plasma clearance of 99m Technetium-diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate, while 24-hour blood pressure (BP) and total peripheral vascular resistance (TVR) were recorded using the commercially available Mobil-O-graph.

Results: Compared to placebo empagliflozin reduced RBF by 6% in the DM2-CKD group (p<0.001), while there were non-significant decreases of 4% in the DM2 group and 1% in the CKD group (p=0.29 and 0.72). Empagliflozin reduced GFR, BP and TVR in all groups. Although total renal vascular resistance (RVR) remained unchanged, calculations based on Gomez’ equations revealed a reduction of post-glomerular…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 17 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free