Evidence Hub

Postmenopausal bone loss at multiple skeletal sites: relationship to estrogen use

Wasnich R, Yano K, Vogel J

Journal of chronic diseases, 1983

608 participants

Abstract

Bone mineral content (BMC) was measured in the distal radius, proximal radius, and os calcis in 608 postmenopausal women, and the values were compared to vertebral osteoporosis and compression fractures determined radiographically, as well as to history of estrogen use. Current estrogen users had significantly higher BMC at all appendicular sites as compared to non-users. Prior estrogen users had lower appendicular BMC's than current users, but they were still significantly higher than non-users. However, radiographic assessment of the lumbar spine showed no difference in osteoporosis or compression fracture prevalence between prior users and non-users of estrogen, whereas current estrogen users had a significantly lower prevalence of osteoporosis in the spine. These findings suggest that estrogen effect on trabecular bone in the os calcis may be more transient than on cortical, appendicular bone. They also suggest that long term or permanent estrogen replacement is required to prevent spinal compression fractures.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 608 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free