Evidence Hub

Histopathological characterization of melorheostosis

Hoshi K, Amizuka N, Kurokawa T, Nakamura K, Shiro R, Ozawa H

Orthopedics, 2001

Abstract

Melorheostotic bone was examined histopathologically. In the severely affected areas, an abundance of osteoid and increased angiogenesis was observed. Increased osteoid without mineralization indicated the overproduction of bone matrix. Bone resorption also appeared to increase because osteoclasts were numerous in melorheostotic bone, thus suggesting a high rate of bone turnover. In addition, transforming growth factor-beta was immunolocalized in the periosteal fibroblasts, mesenchymal cells surrounding vessels, endothelial cells, and osteoblasts, while basic fibroblast growth factor was found in endothelial cells and mast cells near vessels. These cytokines may have some association with the exuberant bone matrix production and angiogenesis in melorheostosis.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free