Evidence Hub

Osteoporosis in men with hyperprolactinemic hypogonadism

Greenspan SL, Neer RM, Ridgway EC, Klibanski A

Annals of internal medicine, 1986

18 participants

Abstract

To ascertain the effects of chronic hyperprolactinemia and testosterone deficiency on skeletal integrity in men, we measured forearm bone density and hormone concentrations in 18 men aged 30 to 79 who had prolactin-secreting pituitary tumors. We also measured vertebral bone density in 12 of the men. Patients with hyperprolactinemia had significant decreases in both forearm (p less than 0.001) and vertebral bone density (p = 0.003) compared with age-matched controls. Cortical osteopenia was significantly related to the duration of hyperprolactinemia (p less than 0.01) but not to the absolute levels of prolactin or androgens. Seven patients had longitudinal follow-up measurements of forearm bone density. Normalization of serum levels of prolactin or testosterone was associated with an increase in forearm bone density (p less than 0.05). These data show that chronic hyperprolactinemia and testosterone deficiency in men have deleterious and previously unrecognized extragonadal effects that may be alleviated after normalization of hormone concentrations.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 18 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free