Evidence Hub

Quantitative evaluation of bone scintigraphy in the assessment of Paget's disease activity

Pons F, Alvarez L, Peris P, Guañabens N, Vidal-Sicart S, Monegal A, Pavía J, Ballesta AM et al.

Nuclear medicine communications, 1999

Abstract

Interest in the assessment of activity of Paget's disease has increased since the advent of effective therapies. The aim of this study was to develop a quantitative method for the scintigraphic assessment of Paget's disease activity in bone. Twenty patients with Paget's disease were studied prospectively. A scintigraphic visual activity index, together with a quantitative activity index that reflects both the extent and activity of the disease, was obtained for each patient. The quantitative activity index is calculated as the sum of the activity (geometric mean measured from the anterior and posterior views) for all affected bones divided by a reference obtained in non-affected bone. To evaluate the validity of the scintigraphic methods, several biochemical markers of bone turnover were assessed: serum total alkaline phosphatase and serum propeptide aminoterminal of type I procollagen (PINP) as markers of bone formation; urinary hydroxyproline and urinary N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) as markers of bone resorption. The visual and quantitative scintigraphic indices were highly correlated (r = 0.78, P < 0.0001). The highest correlations between the biochemical markers and the quantitative activity index were found for PINP (r = 0.69, P < 0.001), which was the most sensitive marker of bone formation, and for urinary NTx (r = 0.63, P < 0.005), which was the most sensitive marker of bone resorption. In conclusion, quantitative evaluation of bone…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free