Evidence Hub

Pseudopermeative skeletal lesions

Helms CA, Munk PL

The British journal of radiology, 1990

19 participants

Abstract

Permeative bone lesions are well known to radiologists and usually invoke a differential diagnosis that includes aggressive lesions such as round cell malignancies and infection. In contrast to permeative lesions, which demonstrate multiple small holes at the endosteal surface of the cortex secondary to a medullary process, we describe a series of 19 patients (seven with aggressive osteoporosis, eight with prior radiation therapy and four with hemangiomas) who demonstrated multiple tiny lucencies in the cortex which were superimposed on the medullary space and mimicked a permeative pattern radiographically. We termed this a pseudopermeative pattern. Recognition of a pseudopermeative pattern may allow a less sinister differential diagnosis to be considered and may avert unnecessary biopsy in many instances.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free