Evidence Hub

Adverse Event Comparison between Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Other Anti-Obesity Medications Following Bariatric Surgery

Samuels JM, Niswender K, Roumie CL, Self W, Holzman M, Spann M, Flynn CR, Ye F et al.

2024

599 participants

Abstract

Introduction: The safety of Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1RAs) following bariatric surgery remains largely unknown. This study aims to compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) with GLP1RAs and other anti-obesity medications (AOMs) after bariatric surgery.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort included patients (ages 16-65) if they met the following criteria: underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy (cohort entry date) and initiated AOMs. Subjects were categorized as users of ‘FDA-approved’ or ‘off label’ AOMs or GLP1RAs AOMs if documented as receiving the medication on the cohort entry date or after. Non-GLP1RA AOMs were Phentermine, Orlistat, Topiramate, Canagliflozin, Dapagliflozin, Empagliflozin, Naltrexone, Bupropion/Naltrexone, and Phentermine/Topiramate. GLP1RAs AOMs included: Semaglutide, Dulaglutide, Exenatide, Liraglutide. Primary outcome was AEs incidence. Logistic regression was used to determine the association of AOM exposure with AEs.

Results: We identified 599 patients meeting inclusion criteria (83% female, median 47.8 years old (IQR 40.9 – 55.4). Median surgery to AOM duration was 30 months (IQR 0 – 62). GLP1RAs were not associated with higher odds of AEs (adjusted Odds Ratio, (aOR) 1.1, [95% CI 0.5 – 2.6] and 1.1 [95% CI 0.6 – 2.3] for GLP1RA versus FDA-approved and ‘Off-Label’ AOMs, respectively. AOM initiation ≥12 months after surgery was associated with lower risk of AEs compared to <12 months…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 599 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free