Evidence Hub

Bone turnover markers and bone mineral density in children with haemophilia

Tlacuilo-Parra A, Villela-Rodríguez J, Garibaldi-Covarrubias R, Soto-Padilla J, Orozco-Alcala J

Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2011

69 participants

Abstract

During childhood growth, bone undergoes modelling involving separate osteoblastic and osteoclastic processes. Markers of bone turnover circulate at high concentrations, parallel the childhood growth curve and correlate with height velocity. The aim of this study was to compare serum markers of bone turnover in children with haemophilia and normal bone mineral density (BMD) vs. those with low BMD. In a cross-sectional study, 69 children with haemophilia were evaluated, 45 children with normal spine BMD vs. 24 with low BMD. Lumbar spine BMD was determined using dual X-ray absorptiometry and Z-scores were calculated. Serum samples of markers of bone turnover, osteocalcin (bone formation) and C-telopeptide of type I collagen (bone resorption) were measured using ELISA. The mean BMD (g cm(-2) ) in the normal group was 0.656 ± 0.15 vs. 0.558 ± 0.12 in those with low BMD (P = 0.007), osteocalcin levels in children with normal BMD were 9.29 ± 4.97 vs. 7.06 ± 2.17 ng μL(-1) in the low BMD group (P = 0.012). C-telopeptide levels in the normal group were 1.06 ± 1.4 vs. 0.74 ± 0.3 ng mL(-1) in the low BMD group (P = 0.169). Our results showed that low osteocalcin levels predominated in the group with low BMD, which indicates a diminished osteoblastic bone formation activity while there were no differences with regard to bone resorption markers. Moreover, osteocalcin levels explain 10% of the variation of lumbar spine Z-score.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 69 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free