Evidence Hub

The comparison of age- and sex-specific alteration in pubic bone microstructure: A cross-sectional cadaveric study

Jadzic J, Mijucic J, Nikolic S, Djuric M, Djonic D

Experimental gerontology, 2021

12 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The burden of age-associated fragility fracture of the pelvis has gradually amplified over the years. Commonly used clinical tools cannot fully explain age-associated fracture risk increase, and microstructural analysis could be required to elucidate pubic bone strength decline in elderly.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study sample encompassed 46 pubic bones obtained from cadaveric donors divided into a young women (60 years, n = 11), young men (60 years, n = 12). Micro-computed tomography was used to evaluate the cortical and trabecular microstructure of pubic bone samples.

RESULTS: Apart from age-associated loss in quantitative trabecular parameters, significant alteration of micro-CT parameters that more closely reflect internal trabecular microarchitectural complexity may contribute to pubic bone strength decline in men and women of advanced age (p < 0.05). Additionally, decreased cortical thickness and increased Ct.Po, Po.Dm and Po.N were found in the anterior and posterior cortical surface of pubic bone samples from the aged individuals (p < 0.05). The more pronounced alteration was noted in aged female donors, illustrated in a significant deterioration trend of the Tb.N, Tb.Sp, and thinner posterior cortical surface with decreased pore spacing (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that age-associated deterioration in trabecular and cortical pubic bone micro-architecture could unravel a morphological basis for decreased pubic bone strength and increased…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free