Evidence Hub

Gender aspects of osteoporosis and bone strength

Patsch JM, Deutschmann J, Pietschmann P

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2011

Abstract

Although postmenopausal and elderly women are more frequently affected by osteoporosis, men are not protected from the disease. Age-related osteoporosis involves several gender-specific clinical aspects such as disease onset time and different dynamics of bone loss. Men benefit from larger bones and a time-delay of age-related changes in bone density and quality. Moreover, secondary osteoporosis is more common in males than in females. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI) represent novel research tools for a noninvasive quantification of bone microstructure which is of interest for musculoskeletal gender studies. For optimal design of such studies, researchers should be aware of technical pitfalls and site-specificity of bone microstructure.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free