Evidence Hub

Denosumab Reduces Lesional Fluoride Skeletal Burden on Na[18F]F PET-CT in Patients With Fibrous Dysplasia/McCune-Albright Syndrome

van der Bruggen W, Vriens D, Meier ME, Smit F, Winter EM, de Geus-Oei LF, Appelman-Dijkstra NM

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2021

8 participants

Abstract

CONTEXT: The correlation between fibrous dysplasia/McCune-Albright syndrome (FD/MAS) skeletal disease burden on Na[18F]F positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and serum bone turnover markers (BTMs) was recently described. The effect of treatment on lesional fluoride burden in FD/MAS is unknown.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate treatment response measurements in patients with FD/MAS who underwent Na[18F]F-PET-CT and treatment with antiresorptives.

METHODS: Observational case series at an academic center of expertise for rare bone diseases. Fifteen consecutive patients were observed with FD/MAS with baseline and follow-up Na[18F]F-PET-CT parameters of healthy bone and FD lesions, BTMs, and pain scores at start of denosumab (n = 8) treatment and non-denosumab patients (n = 7). On Na[18F]F-PET-CT the volumetric measures of FD burden (fluoride tumor volume [FTV]) and "fraction affected skeleton" (FAS) represented the portion of the skeleton affected. This was correlated with BTMs and pain.

RESULTS: Disease activity decreased significantly, with FTV 361 cm3 to 97 cm3 (P = .018) in denosumab-treated patients, but not in non-denosumab patients (P = .249). Serum P1NP and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) decreased significantly: 82 ng/mL vs 55 ng/mL (P = .023) and 119 IU/L vs 84 IU/L (P = .020), respectively. In denosumab-treated patients pain scores improved leading to pain medication reduction. This correlated with lesional uptake, but healthy bone activity did not change.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 8 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free