Evidence Hub

Prolonged pain in patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis may be due to fracture progression

Ueda Y, Inui T, Kurata Y, Tsuji H, Saito J, Shitan Y

European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2021

192 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: Most fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) are conservatively treated in the early phase. However, the definition of conservative treatment failure and the subsequent treatment protocol is controversial. Fracture progression (FP) sometimes occurs during conservative treatment of FFPs. This study aimed to assess the association between FP and prolonged pain in patients with FFPs receiving conservative treatment.

METHODS: Retrospective case series in a single institution in Japan. A total of 192 consecutive FFP patients were identified during study period. Seventy-nine patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. FFPs were diagnosed using both CT and MRI and FP was diagnosed with CT. Patients met criteria for prolonged pain if they had persisting pain after 2 weeks of conservative treatment and had lack of improvement in mobility. The relationship between FP and prolonged pain was analyzed using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS: Of the 79 patients, 18 developed FP. Four of the 18 patients with FP met criteria for prolonged pain. Two of 61 patients without FP had prolonged pain (p = 0.022; odds ratio 8.12). In the entire study cohort, six patients (7.6%) met criteria prolonged pain and underwent elective surgery.

CONCLUSION: In patients with FFPs, prolonged pain was associated with FP (p = 0.022, OR 8.12). The presence of prolonged pain might help identify FP. If FP is identified, surgical treatment may be required with cautious follow-up particularly in cases,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 192 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free