Evidence Hub

Surgical management of paediatric pelvic fractures: a prospective case series and early experience from a level one Egyptian trauma centre

Arafa M, Khalifa AA, Fergany A, Abdelhafez MA, Mohamedean A, Adam FF, Farouk O

International orthopaedics, 2022

45 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to report our early experience treating paediatric pelvic fractures (PPF) surgically, reporting on indications, outcomes, and complications.

METHODS: Patients aged 0-15 with PPF treated surgically at a level I trauma centre were included prospectively between 2016 and 2018. Fractures were classified according to AO/OTA classification system. Functional evaluation was performed using a modification of the Majeed functional scoring system. Radiological evaluation of vertical and posterior displacement was performed according to Matta and Tornetta criteria and the method described by Keshishyan et al. for assessing pelvic rotational asymmetry.

RESULTS: We included 45 patients (77.8% males and 22.2% females), with a mean age of 9.53 ± 3.63 and 19.87 ± 8.84 months of mean follow-up. The functional outcome was excellent in 42 (93.3%) patients, good in two (4.4%), and fair in one (2.2%). Radiologically, the vertical displacement improved from 5.91 ± 4.64 to 3.72 ± 2.87 mm (p-value 0.065), the posterior displacement improved from 7.87 ± 8.18 to 5.33 ± 13.4 mm (p-value 0.031), and the symphyseal diastasis improved from 9.88 ± 7.51 mm to 7.68 ± 3.18 mm (p-value 0.071). Residual pelvic asymmetry improved from 1.2 ± 0.61 to 0.8 ± 0.7 (p-value 0.001). Complications occurred in 21 (46.7%) patients, 11 (24.4%) pin tract infection, six (13.3%) limb length discrepancy, two (4.4%) prominent metals, one (2.2%) subcutaneous haematoma, one (2.2%) infected ISS.

CONCLUSIONS: We…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 45 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free