Evidence Hub

Histologic analysis of a retrieved microporous-coated femoral prosthesis. A seven-year case report

Bobyn JD, Engh CA, Glassman AH

Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1987

Abstract

A microporous-coated femoral prosthesis with an average pore size of 80 to 100 microns was retrieved after seven years in a revision operation on a failed cemented acetabular component. The proximal anterior and lateral aspects of the implant were encrusted with bone. The bone was attached to the porous coating in regions of ingrowth. The implant was stable within the femur although most of the porous coating was not bone ingrown. There was progressive bone resorption in the proximal femur, suggestive of a reactive biologic mechanism. There was also a sizable posterior pocket of granulation tissue containing chronic inflammatory round cells associated with numerous birefringent polymeric particles. Polyethylene wear debris and acrylic cement were engulfed by multinucleated giant cells enveloping the loose cup.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free