Evidence Hub

Evaluation of the Effects of Empagliflozin on Acute Lung Injury in Rat Intestinal Ischemia-Reperfusion Model

Puren Gökbulut, Şerife Mehlika Kuşkonmaz, Gönül Koç, Çağatay Emir Önder, Nıhat Yumuşak, Özcan Erel, Arzu Sakallı Nural, Cavit Çulha

Research Square, 2022

Abstract

Abstract Background: Empagliflozin is a selective sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT2) inhibitor that is accepted for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Positive effects of empagliflozin on systems other than diabetes have been detected. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of empagliflozin on acute lung injury induced by intestinal ischemia/ reperfusion (I/R). Materials and methods: A total of 27 male Wistar albino rats were divided into 3 groups: sham, I/R, and I/R+ empagliflozin; each group contains 9 animals. Sham group animals underwent laparotomy without I/R injury. After I/R groups animals underwent laparotomy, 1 h of superior mesenteric artery ligation was followed by 2 h of reperfusion. In the empagliflozin group, 7 days before I/R, empagliflozin (30 mg/kg) was administered by gastric gavage. All animals were killed at the end of reperfusion and lung tissue samples were obtained for immunohistochemical staining and histopathological investigation in all groups. Results: Serum glucose, AST, ALT, creatinine, native thiol, total thiol, and disulfide levels and disulfide–native thiol, disulfide–total thiol, and native thiol–total thiol ratios as well as the IMA levels were analyzed and compared among the groups. While intestinal I/R significantly increases serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and creatinine levels; Thiol/Disulfide did not cause any change in homeostasis parameters and IMA level. Empagliflozin treatment had no…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free