Evidence Hub

Abbreviated or standard antiplatelet therapy after PCI in HBR patients with chronic kidney disease: a prespecified analysis from the MASTER DAPT trial

A. Landi, F. Mahfoud, E. Frigoli, K. Chalkou, D. Heg, R. Abhaichand, A. Abhyankar, Emanuele Barbato et al.

EuroIntervention, 2025

4,579 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abbreviated antiplatelet therapy (APT) can reduce bleeding without increasing ischaemic harm in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the safety and effectiveness of abbreviated APT remains unknown.

AIMS

We aimed to investigate the comparative effectiveness of abbreviated (1 month) versus standard (≥3 months) APT in HBR patients with and without CKD.

METHODS

This was a prespecified analysis from the MASTER DAPT trial, which randomised 4,579 HBR patients (1,428 [31%] with CKD) to abbreviated or standard APT. CKD was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Co-primary outcomes were net adverse clinical events (NACE; a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, and major bleeding), major adverse cardiac or cerebral events (MACCE; all-cause death, MI and stroke), and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3, or 5 bleeding at 11 months.

RESULTS

NACE did not significantly differ with abbreviated and standard APT among CKD patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-1.24) and non-CKD patients (HR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.73-1.27; pinteraction=0.78). Similarly, MACCE did not differ in CKD patients (HR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.64-1.27) and non-CKD patients (HR 1.09, 95% CI: 0.78-1.51; pinteraction=0.45). Abbreviated APT was associated with consistently lower BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding in both patients with CKD (HR…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 4,579 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free