Evidence Hub

Changes in absolute coronary blood flow and myocardial resistance after percutaneous coronary intervention

F. Marin, S. Fawaz, R. Kotronias, J. Chai, Jason Walsh, T. Mahendiran, G. Karamasis, Christopher M. Cook et al.

EuroIntervention, 2026

52 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treating a coronary stenosis by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) aims to relieve myocardial ischaemia by improving coronary blood flow. The evolution of coronary flow and resistance post-PCI is not fully understood.

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the immediate impact of PCI on absolute coronary flow (Q), and epicardial and microvascular resistance (Repi and Rμ).

METHODS

In a two-centre cohort including 52 patients, pre- and post-PCI physiological assessments were performed using continuous thermodilution, via a combination of a pressure-temperature sensor wire and a dedicated infusion microcatheter.

RESULTS

Resting Q remained similar before and after PCI (Δ +2 [interquartile range [IQR] -9 to 21] mL/min; p=0.21), as a 193 Wood unit (WU) reduction in resting Repi (Δ -193 [IQR -400 to -59] WU; p<0.001) was offset by a 267 WU increase in resting Rμ (Δ +267 [IQR -20 to 474] WU; p=0.002). Conversely, hyperaemic Q rose significantly (Δ +44 [IQR 16 to 92] mL/min; p<0.001), reflecting a 195 WU reduction in hyperaemic Repi (Δ -195 [IQR -379 to -82] WU; p<0.001), while hyperaemic Rμ remained stable (Δ +3 [IQR -96 to 75] WU; p=0.87). The median microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) did not change significantly after PCI (Δ -0.2 [IQR -0.7 to 0.6]; p=0.301). Pre- and post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) were strongly and inversely associated with Repi and predicted the improvement of hyperaemic Q.

CONCLUSIONS

PCI significantly reduces epicardial resistance,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 52 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free