Evidence Hub

Anti-Shigella activity and killing kinetics of compounds from MMV Pathogen and COVID Boxes: Identifying leads against Shigellosis

Tchokouaha Yamthe LR, Kengne Mediesse F, Melogmo Dongmo YK, Matchuenkam Gayap SR, Dize D, Tsouh Fokou PV, Boyom FF

Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery, 2026

Abstract

Background: Shigellosis is a leading diarrheal disease, posing critical public health challenges in low- and middle-income countries. Rising antibiotic resistance exacerbates treatment limitations.

Methods: We screened 560 compounds from the MMV Pathogen and COVID Boxes for in vitro activity against Shigella flexneri, S. sonnei, and S. dysenteriae via resazurin-based microdilution. Cytotoxicity (RAW 264.7 cells) and killing kinetics against S. flexneri were assessed.

Results: From the primary screen, 13 compounds (9 from the Pathogen Box, 4 from the COVID Box) showed potent anti-Shigella activity against S. flexneri (MIC ≤10 μM). Among these, seven non-antibiotic Pathogen Box compounds exhibited low-micromolar MICs (0.31-5 μM) and low cytotoxicity (CC50 > 100 μM). The known antibiotic levofloxacin (MMV687798) showed broad-spectrum activity (MIC 0.15-2.5 μM). MMV1804312 (salinomycin) was the most active COVID Box hit (MIC 1.25 μM). Time-kill assays revealed rapid, concentration-dependent bactericidal activity (≥3-log reduction within 4-6 h) for Pathogen Box compounds MMV675997 and MMV021660, while MMV000858 displayed bacteriostatic action.

Conclusion: This study identifies several novel, non-antibiotic leads from the MMV Pathogen Box with potent anti-Shigella activity and favorable cytotoxicity profiles, offering promising starting points for further development against drug-resistant shigellosis.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a report, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free