Evidence Hub

P291 Evaluating the impact of educational material on anastrozole treatment adherence – the baseline results of the ARTEMIS study

Jean Marie Nogaret, T. Vanlerberghe

The Breast, 2011

1 citation

Abstract

Goals:We performed a meta-analysis of three randomised sub-studies of the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial to determine the effects of exemestane and tamoxifen on bone health.Methods: Patients received exemestane or tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed at baseline and after 12 and 24 months of treatment.Bone turnover markers were also measured.Results: Patients receiving tamoxifen showed a mean increase from baseline in lumbar spine BMD of 1.2% at month 12 and 0.2% at month 24.Patients receiving exemestane showed a mean decrease from baseline of 2.6% after 12 months and 3.5% after 24 months.There were significant differences in the changes in lumbar spine BMD between treatment groups (P < 0.0001 at both time points).Changes in BMD from baseline at the total hip were also significantly different between exemestane and tamoxifen (P < 0.05 at both time points).Bone turnover markers decreased from baseline with tamoxifen and increased with exemestane.Conclusion: Exemestane resulted in decreases in BMD and increases in bone turnover markers.BMD increased and bone turnover markers decreased with tamoxifen.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free