Evidence Hub

Thymectomy in Non-thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis: Results from MGTX, a Randomized, Controlled Trial (S28.003)

G. Cutter, H. Kaminski, G. Wolfe, I. Aban, On Behalf Of The Mgtx Trial Research Group

Neurology, 2016

126 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Does extended transsternal thymectomy (ETTX) combined with a defined prednisone protocol, compared with the prednisone protocol alone: result in a greater improvement in myasthenic weakness; result in a lower total dose of prednisone; and enhance the quality of life by reduction of adverse events?

BACKGROUND

Since first utilized in 1941, a benefit from thymectomy in non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis (MG) has been claimed by numerous studies. In 2000, an evidence-based review summarized outcomes from 21 controlled, non-randomized MG cohorts, pointed out methodological flaws preventing definite conclusions regarding the procedure’s benefit and concluded that thymectomy should be a treatment option. In concert with calls dating back a half century, the reviewers recommended a controlled, randomized study that employed a standardized medical therapy.

METHODS

MGTX was organized as a five-continent, international, single-blinded, randomized trial with the aim to answer three questions posed above. Inclusion criteria were MG Foundation of America Clinical Classification 2 to 4, elevated acetylcholine receptor antibody levels, age >18.0 and <65.0 years, and disease history <5 years. Patients were followed in single-blind fashion for a minimum of 3 years.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were enrolled between 2006 and 2012 across 36 sites. The mean age was 35.1 years. MGFA Class at the time of randomization: 39.7[percnt] were class IIa, 25[percnt] Class IIb , 22[percnt]…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 126 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free