Evidence Hub

The association between pro-inflammatory cytokines, regional cerebral metabolism, and cognitive complaints following adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Pomykala KL, Ganz PA, Bower JE, Kwan L, Castellon SA, Mallam S, Cheng I, Ahn R et al.

Brain imaging and behavior, 2013

33 participants · 107 citations

Abstract

To examine relationships following adjuvant chemotherapy between circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines, regional cerebral metabolism, and cognitive complaints in early stage breast cancer patients. 33 breast cancer patients who had completed initial treatment (surgery, ± radiation, 23 chemotherapy, 10 no chemotherapy) obtained resting (18)F-FDG PET/CT brain imaging at baseline and 1 year later. Pro-inflammatory cytokine markers (IL-1ra, sTNF-RII, CRP, and IL-6) and cognitive complaints were also assessed at both time points. At baseline, consistent correlations were seen between the left medial frontal and right inferior lateral anterior temporal cortices and inflammatory markers within the chemotherapy group, and not in the no chemotherapy group. After 1 year, correlations persisted in the medial frontal cortex and the temporal cortex, the latter shifting superiorly. Both of these regional correlations demonstrated the highest levels of significance when looking across the 1 year time frame (IL-1ra: peak voxel p < 0.0005; cluster size p < 0.0005, p = 0.001 after correction (medial prefrontal), p < 0.0005; cluster size p = 0.001, p = 0.029 corr. (anterior temporal), sTNF-RII: p < 0.0005; cluster size p = 0.001, p = 0.040 corr. (medial prefrontal)). Positive correlations were also seen within the chemotherapy group between baseline memory complaints and the medial frontal (p < 0.0005; cluster size p < 0.0005, p < 0.0005 corr.) and anterior temporal (p < 0.0005; cluster size…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 33 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free