Evidence Hub

Abstract 102: Once-weekly somapacitan versus daily growth hormone in children born small for gestational age: 1-year results from a randomised phase 2 trial

V. Nagarajan, A. Juul, P. Backeljauw, M. Kawai, A. Linglart, N. Zuckerman-Levin, R. Horikawa, Presenting on behalf of the REAL 5 authors

Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 2022

13 participants

Abstract

Treatment of short stature in children born small for gestational age (SGA) requires daily growth hormone (GH) injections that can be burdensome for patients and caregivers. Once-weekly somapacitan is a long-acting GH in phase 3 development for replacement therapy in children with GH deficiency. We report the 52-week results of the first phase 2, multinational, randomised, open-label, controlled, dose-finding trial (NCT03878446) investigating efficacy and safety of somapacitan as treatment for short stature in children born SGA compared with daily GH (Norditropin®, Novo Nordisk A/S). Sixty-two (62; 35.5% female) GH-treatment-naïve, prepubertal children received 0.16, 0.20 or 0.24 mg/kg/week subcutaneous (s.c.) somapacitan, or 0.035 or 0.067 mg/kg/day s.c. GH. All children were subsequently included in a long-term safety extension trial. At week 52, the observed mean height velocity (HV) was 8.5, 10.3 and 10.6 cm/year for 0.16 (n = 12), 0.20 (n = 13) and 0.24 mg/kg/week (n = 12) somapacitan, respectively, versus 9.4 and 11.2 cm/year for 0.035 (n = 11) and 0.067 mg/kg/day (n = 13) GH, respectively. The effect of the three somapacitan doses vs. GH on HV was not statistically significantly different. A similar pattern as seen for HV was observed for changes from baseline in height standard deviation score (SDS) and HV SDS. Dose-dependent increases in IGF-I SDS were observed with somapacitan and GH, and significant exposure-response relationships to HV were established for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 13 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free