Evidence Hub

Clinical Features and Treatment Outcomes of Medication Overuse Headache in Older Patients: Insights from a Nationwide Prospective Registry

Yoo-ha Hong, Mi-Kyoung Kang, Hong-Kyun Park, M. Chu, Sun-Young Oh, Jin-Ju Kang, Heui-Soo Moon, Mi-Ji Lee et al.

Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025

791 participants

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Medication overuse headache (MOH) presents unique clinical challenges in older adults due to age-related changes and comorbidities. However, data on MOH characteristics and treatment responses in this population remain limited. This study investigated the clinical features, treatment patterns, and short-term outcomes of MOH in older patients. Methods: We analyzed data from the RELEASE registry, a nationwide, multicenter prospective cohort of MOH patients in South Korea. Participants were stratified into older (≥65 years) and younger (<65 years) groups. We compared clinical features, treatment patterns, and 3-month outcomes, and identified factors associated with treatment response in the older group. Results: Among 791 patients, 72 (9.1%) were older. Compared to younger patients, older patients reported more monthly headache days (30.0 vs. 27.0, p = 0.012), more days using acute medication (30.0 vs. 20.0, p < 0.001), and fewer headache-free days (0.0 vs. 3.0, p = 0.012). They also experienced more severe headache days (12.5 vs. 10.0, p = 0.056). Despite this, older patients showed lower disability, with significantly lower Migraine Disability Assessment scores (30.0 vs. 46.0, p < 0.001) and a trend toward lower Headache Impact Test-6 scores (64.5 vs. 66.0, p = 0.065). In multivariable analysis, poor adherence to preventive treatment (≤24%) was significantly associated with non-response (OR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02–0.96, p = 0.045) at 3 months.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 791 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free