Evidence Hub

Development of a population pharmacokinetic model of pyrazinamide to guide personalized therapy: impacts of geriatric and diabetes mellitus on clearance

R. Kim, Rannissa Puspita Jayanti, Hongyeul Lee, Hyun-Kuk Kim, Jiyeon Kang, InWoo Park, Jehun Kim, Jee Youn Oh et al.

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2023

610 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Objectives: This study was performed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of pyrazinamide for Korean tuberculosis (TB) patients and to explore and identify the influence of demographic and clinical factors, especially geriatric diabetes mellitus (DM), on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of pyrazinamide (PZA). Methods: PZA concentrations at random post-dose points, demographic characteristics, and clinical information were collected in a multicenter prospective TB cohort study from 18 hospitals in Korea. Data obtained from 610 TB patients were divided into training and test datasets at a 4:1 ratio. A population PK model was developed using a nonlinear mixed-effects method. Results: A one-compartment model with allometric scaling for body size effect adequately described the PK of PZA. Geriatric patients with DM (age >70 years) were identified as a significant covariate, increasing the apparent clearance of PZA by 30% (geriatric patients with DM: 5.73 L/h; others: 4.50 L/h), thereby decreasing the area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h by a similar degree compared with other patients (geriatric patients with DM: 99.87 μg h/mL; others: 132.3 μg h/mL). Our model was externally evaluated using the test set and provided better predictive performance compared with the previously published model. Conclusion: The established population PK model sufficiently described the PK of PZA in Korean TB patients. Our model will be useful in therapeutic drug monitoring to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 610 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free